Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27331

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : VC06 - VC10 Full Version

School Teachers’ Knowledge and Attitude towards Mental Disorders among School-going Children: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65338.19078
Lubna Tyagdal, Akshay Shreekrishna Phatak

1. MBBS Final Year Student, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Akshay Shreekrishna Phatak,
Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar-581301, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: drakshay1007@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Mental disorders in children can present with non specific behavioural issues, like irritability and procrastination. These issues are often neglected, which can negatively affect academic performance and overall development. Teachers hold a unique position to promote mental health and facilitate early identification of mental disorders, leading to timely referrals for early intervention.

Aim: To examine the knowledge and attitude of school teachers towards mental disorders in school-going children.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Karwar city over a period of two months (July and August 2019) at the Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, India. A total of 121 primary and high school teachers from 11 schools participated in the study. Purposive sampling was used, as all schools in Karwar city were approached for the study. A self-designed questionnaire consisting of 20 questions (10 questions on knowledge and 10 questions on attitude towards children with mental disorders) was used. Descriptive statistics, such as percentages, were used for data analysis.

Results: The study revealed that teachers had moderate knowledge about child mental disorders. However, there was a lack of awareness about the treatment and care of such children. Sixty-three (52.07%) teachers believed that mental disorders result from incorrect thinking. Seventy-nine (65.29%) teachers were of the opinion that sleeping pills are not the only available treatment. Attitude towards children with mental disorders were both positive and negative. 82 (67.77%) teachers believed such children to be less intelligent, while 76 (62.81%) teachers did not believe mentally ill children indulge in violence. Many teachers were aware that these children can be vulnerable to bullying and discrimination by their peers.

Conclusion: The study concluded that there is moderate knowledge and mixed attitude among school teachers regarding mental disorders in school-going children. This highlights the need for proper training programs that can aid in early identification, timely referrals for mental health evaluation, and the promotion of child mental health.

Keywords

Academic performance, Evaluation, Mental illness, Treatment

Childhood and adolescence are crucial age groups for learning, personality development, and social skill development. However, they are also vulnerable periods when factors like physical illness or mental illness can have long-lasting consequences on learning and development. Mental illnesses are often neglected, and symptoms are attributed to laziness or indiscipline. The common mental disorders seen in children and adolescents are developmental problems like mental retardation and autism spectrum disorders, disruptive disorders including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders (1). These disorders often present with non specific behavioural and emotional symptoms like withdrawn behaviour, irritability, procrastination, declining academic performance, and school refusal. The prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents is estimated to be 10-20%, as per World Health Organisation (WHO) (2). Such children often face bullying, stigma, isolation, discrimination by their peers, and sometimes even by teachers (3).

School-going children spend a significant portion of their time in schools interacting with peers and teachers (4). Thus, teachers are in a unique position to identify and help children with behavioural problems (5),(6). In many cases, they are the first ones to recognise such conditions in an affected student (7),(8). Teachers can also educate parents of such children and guide them. However, a glaring lack of awareness about mental disorders among teachers is a major limiting factor in this regard (9). If awareness is created among school teachers, they can serve as a crucial link in identifying children with mental disorders, spreading awareness about mental health, and reducing stigma, bullying, and discrimination.

There is a paucity of child mental health services in India, leading to poor care for children with mental disorders (10). Additionally, there is a lack of psychologists and counselors in schools where mental disorders can be identified early. Hence, the role of teachers becomes even more important. According to the WHO, mental disorders are the single most common cause of disability in young children and adolescents (2). This makes this age group a critical period in which mental health can be promoted and mental disorders can be addressed. If left untreated, mental disorders can impede all aspects of health, including emotional well-being, social and personality development. Addressing these problems early in life can lead to improvements in social and behavioural adjustment, learning outcomes, and school performance.

This study aimed to assess the knowledge of child mental disorders among school teachers. The objective was to understand the attitude of teachers towards children with mental disorders, as negative attitude can lead to discrimination and poor outcomes. This information can help in formulating effective school mental health programs.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar, Karnataka, India, between July and August 2019. The study received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (Reference number-IEC/KRIMS/O/05/2018). Written informed consent was obtained from all participating teachers.

Inclusion criteria: School teachers from primary and high schools in Karwar city and teachers who agreed to participate were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Teachers from schools that declined to participate or did not provide consent were excluded from the study.

Sampling method: Purposive sampling was used, approaching all school teachers in Karwar city for the study.

Sample size calculation: A total of 121 teachers were included in the study through complete enumeration, which means all teachers who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study.

Study Procedure

Data was collected using a self-designed questionnaire in English and Kannada, comprising 20 questions about knowledge and attitude towards mental disorders in school-going children. The questionnaire was developed based on prevailing social and cultural attitudes and existing research (11),(12). It comprised of two parts: Part A with 10 questions for knowledge assessment and Part B with 10 questions to assess attitude towards children with mental disorders.

To test the reliability of the questionnaire, a pilot study was conducted with 30 responses. The calculated Cronbach’s Alpha value was 0.718, which was considered acceptable. Each question was scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree, agree, don’t know, disagree, to strongly disagree. After data collection, response categories were combined to simplify the results. The percentage of respondents reporting agreement includes both “agree” and “strongly agree” responses, while the percentage reporting disagreement includes both “disagree” and “strongly disagree” responses. A total of 121 teachers from 11 schools agreed to participate in the study. The purpose and methodology were explained to them, and confidentiality was assured. Any questions about the study raised by the teachers were addressed. The responses were collected and taken to the parent institute for further analysis.

Statistical Analysis

After complete data collection, a master chart was prepared, and descriptive statistics, such as percentages, were used to categorise the data.

Results

Out of the 13 schools approached, two schools declined to participate in the study. One school cited a busy schedule, while the other felt it served no useful purpose. Among the remaining 11 schools, only 121 out of 160 teachers consented to participate in the study, while the remaining 39 did not consent.

Responses to knowledge items are summarised in (Table/Fig 1). The results showed that 114 teachers (94.21%) were knowledgeable about the fact that mental disorders can occur at any age, and 107 teachers (88.43%) responded positively that mental health services should be sought for persistent behavioural problems in children. Twenty-eight teachers (23.14%) believed that mental disorders do not affect academic performance. Ten teachers (8.27%) believed there is no treatment for mental disorders in children, eight teachers (6.61%) did not know, and the remaining teachers were aware that treatment was available. Twenty-seven teachers (22.31%) believed children with mental disorders have low chances of recovery, 15 teachers (12.4%) did not know about the prognosis, and 79 teachers (65.29%) did not agree that all children with mental disorders had low recovery chances. Ninety-three teachers (76.86%) were aware that mental disorders in children can occur due to stressful life events, while 12 teachers (9.92%) were not aware of this fact. About 88 teachers (72.73%) were aware that not all mental disorders in children are due to external stressors. About 63 (52.07%) teachers attributed mental disorders in children to incorrect thinking, while 25 teachers (20.66%) did not know whether incorrect thinking contributed to mental disorders. Thirty-three teachers (27.27%) were aware that incorrect thinking patterns are not the cause of all mental disorders in children. Seventy-nine teachers (65.29%) were of the opinion that sleeping pills are not the only treatment available for mental disorders. Ninety-six teachers (79.34%) were aware that not all mental disorders in children are inherited.

Responses to attitude items are summarised in (Table/Fig 2). The results revealed that teachers had both positive and negative attitudes towards children with mental disorders. About 28 teachers (23.14%) believed that children with mental disorders are violent, while 76 (62.81%) disagreed. Eighty-two teachers (67.77%) believed that children with mental disorders are not as smart as other children. Fourteen teachers (11.57%) believed that children have mental disorders because of their upbringing. Seventy-eight teachers (64.46%) disagreed that such children are mentally weak and should be blamed for their condition. The majority of the teachers, 101 (83.47%), were of the opinion that such children should not be discouraged from attending school. Eighty-nine teachers (73.55%) had no problem in dealing with parents of children with mental disorders. Forty-four teachers (36.36%) were not aware that other children tend to discriminate against children with mental disorders. Seventy teachers (57.85%) were of the opinion that it would be difficult for them if they had a child with a mental disorder. Ninety-four teachers (77.68%) had no problem with their children having friends with mental disorders. Ninety-seven teachers (80.16%) responded positively that the management of children with mental disorders was not a waste of time and resources.

Discussion

Childhood and adolescence are periods characterised by rapid development not only in the physical domain but also emotionally and cognitively. Most people go through this period without significant mental health problems, but almost everyone experiences some emotional distress. Approximately one in five children display signs of poor mental health and meet the criteria for a mental illness at any given time (13). About half of all mental illnesses begin in childhood and adolescence. Schools provide a great opportunity to identify and support children who are experiencing emotional difficulties and promote overall emotional well-being, social development, and moral development. School experiences are important for both intellectual development and psychological well-being, and the close connection between emotional health and academic achievement, hence, schools enhance school achievement by attending to issues such as self-esteem and social well-being (14),(15). Strengthening student protective factors and resilience within schools reduces negative risks and outcomes for vulnerable children. Promoting school mental health helps decrease violence and juvenile crime.

Children spend a significant amount of time in schools and face various challenges in academics, social interactions, sports, and extracurricular activities. Psychological problems make it difficult for children to cope with these challenges. Teachers have a significant responsibility for educating their students, and working with children who have mental health problems can be both rewarding and challenging. Often, it is the teachers who identify behavioural problems in children. However, due to a lack of awareness about the nature of mental disorders, children are subjected to punishments and are often put down in front of their peers. This further worsens psychological problems, leads to bullying, discrimination, and isolation. Learning about school mental health will help teachers and not just be one more thing to do.

Many teachers express the need for assistance in promoting well-being within the classrooms and in recognising and aiding students facing mental health issues. When teachers feel more capable of supporting students’ mental health, it becomes simpler for them to handle challenging classroom behaviour and facilitate students’ academic achievements. If teachers are knowledgeable about mental disorders in children and adolescents, they can play a key role in identifying and guiding children with mental disorders. Previous research done in this field has revealed that teachers often lack adequate knowledge about ADHD, specific learning disorders, and autism spectrum disorder (3),(11),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20). Present study assessed knowledge about child mental disorders in general. In present study, 114 (94.21%) teachers were knowledgeable about the fact that mental disorders can occur at any age. A study done by Parikh N et al., concluded that the majority of teachers had poor knowledge about signs and symptoms of mental disorders (3). Similarly, another large study done by Kamel A et al., in Saudi Arabia, involving teachers from 420 schools, reported that a considerable number of teachers had low awareness about risk factors, causes, and signs and symptoms of mental disorders (21). Alshammari SA et al., found that 40% of teachers believed that mental disorders like depression are rare in adolescents (9).

In present study, 107 (88.43%) teachers positively responded that mental health services should be sought if needed. Similarly, in a study done by Latifeh Y et al., 71% of teachers agreed that referring children with behavioural issues for psychotherapy is advantageous (22). A study done by Akpan MU et al., showed that overall academic scores of pupils (12.9%) with behavioural disorders were significantly low compared to others (9.1%) without behavioural disorders (23). Mental disorders in school-going children can lead to an inability to concentrate in the classrooms, a lack of stamina, difficulty in managing assignments, and difficulty in communicating with students and teachers. In present current study, 28 (23.14%) teachers believed that mental disorders do not affect academic performance. In a study done by Alshammari SA et al., 99% of teachers were aware that mental disorders like depression can affect academic grades (9). In present study, 10 (8.27%) teachers were of the view that there is no treatment for mental disorders in children, while 8 (6.61%) believed that the only treatment available was sleeping pills. Studies by Ghanizadeh A et al., and Brook U et al., also showed that teachers lacked knowledge about the medications available for mental disorders (17),(24). Similarly, Parikh N et al., concluded that teachers had poor knowledge about the treatment aspects of mental disorders (3). In the study done by Kamel A et al., more than half of the participants were unaware of psycho-behavioural interventions for mental disorders (21).

A study done by Low NCP et al., Adrian C, and Hammen C and Hammen C showed that stressful life events and external stressors like family disruptions (divorce/separation, new family), interpersonal relationship stress (parents, siblings, friends), personal stress (romantic break-ups, health issues, weight, school work), etc., lead to mental disorders in children (25),(26),(27). Ninety-three (76.86%) teachers in present study were aware that stressful life events can lead to mental disorders in children. Eighty-eight (72.73%) teachers in present study were aware that not all mental disorders in children are due to stress alone. To support this, a study by Youseff MK et al., showed that 33.2% of teachers believed that ADHD is inherited (18). Teacher’s awareness of stress in the causation of mental disorders in children has not been adequately researched. Ninety-six (79.34%) teachers in present study were of the view that not all mental disorders in children are inherited in the family, while a study by Kamel A et al., showed that 44.4% of the participating teachers believed that inheritance played a role in mental illnesses (21).

In the present study, 82 (67.76%) teachers believed that children with mental disorders are less smart compared to other children. Additionally, 70 (57.85%) teachers felt that it would be difficult for them to cope if they had children with mental disorders. Fourteen (11.57%) teachers were of the view that children have mental disorders because their parents did not raise them properly. A study done by Nur N and Kavakci O and Ghanizadeh A et al., showed that 65.5% and 53.1% of teachers, respectively, believed that ADHD in children is because of bad parenting (11),(17). Latifeh Y et al., also reported that 88% of teachers believed that bad parenting and abuse lead to mental illness (22). A study by Prabhu V et al., showed that 53.8% of teachers had an opinion that such children are not harmful to other children (16). Similar results were found in present study, where 76 (62.81%) disagreed with the fact that children with mental health illnesses can be violent. In present study, 44 (36.36%) teachers were not aware that other children discriminate against children with mental disorders. A study by Wahl O showed that 71% of students had no problem being friends with mentally ill people, 56% were okay with having such classmates, 51% were willing to share their benches in the classroom with such students, and 41% had no issues with doing class projects with such students (12).

In the study done by Parikh N et al., it was found that teachers had a significant negative attitude towards the mentally ill, including poor acceptance of people with mental illness, not wanting to discuss mental issues in the classroom, feeling ashamed of taking psychiatric treatment, and believing that having children with mental illness in the classroom was bad (3). Kamel A et al., found that the majority of teachers had positive attitudes towards people with mental illness, with the majority of teachers showing acceptance of people with mental illness and agreeing that those with mental disorders should be referred to a psychiatrist. However, about 42% of teachers believed that psychiatric medications are addictive, and around 20% of teachers felt that mental illnesses are incurable and that children with mental illness can be dangerous (21).

There were also a few positive attitudes found in present study like, the majority of teachers had no problem dealing with parents of children with mental disorders, believed that such children should not be discouraged from attending school, would allow their children to have friendships with children who have a mental disorder, and believed that it is not a waste of time and resources to care for children with mental disorders.

It is not necessary for teachers to determine whether a child has a mental disorder or to diagnose a child with a mental disorder. Attempting to diagnose children risks inappropriately labelling a child, alienating children and their parents, and requires specialised training. Rather, it is important for teachers to understand how to support the mental health of all students and to determine when mental health problems are severe enough to require additional help from family members and/or a mental health specialist.

Limitation(s)

The limitations of the present study include not considering teachers’ socio-demographic details and the lack of psychometric testing of the self-designed questionnaire. This study has a drawback because it lacked a widely validated assessment tool to measure all aspects of teachers’ knowledge and attitude that were studied. Additionally, since the study was confined to Karwar city, these findings may not be generalisable to other surrounding rural areas. There is a lack of tools for assessing teachers’ perception of mental health issues in children. Hence, further studies are needed to better understand teachers’ knowledge and attitudes about mental health, which can help in understanding the needs of school teachers and training them.

Conclusion

It was found that there is moderate knowledge about the occurrence of child mental disorders, the need for treatment referral, and the effect on academic performance among teachers. There were both positive and negative attitudes towards children with mental disorders. Tolerant attitudes and encouragement by teachers can improve low self-esteem, reduce social isolation, and discrimination. There is a necessity for programs to create awareness among school teachers about mental disorders in children and to create school environments that can promote mental well-being in children. Such programs can aid in the early identification, timely referrals for mental health evaluation and intervention, and the promotion of child mental health. There is a need for future research in the field of school mental health to facilitate and assess the effectiveness of school mental health programs and policies.

References

1.
Malhotra S, Kohli A, Arun P. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in school children in India. Indian J Med Res. 2002;116:21-28.
2.
World Health Organisation. Improving the mental and brain health of children and adolescents. [Internet]. 2018 Jan [cited 2023 Aug 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/activities/improving-the-mental-and-brain-health-of-children-and-adolescents.
3.
Parikh N, Parikh M, Vankar G, Solanki C, Banwari G, Sharma P. Knowledge and attitudes of secondary and higher secondary school teachers toward mental illness in Ahmedabad. Indian J Soc Psychiat. 2016;32(1):56-62. [crossref]
4.
Ogorchukwu JM, Sekaran VC, Nair S, Ashok L. Mental health literacy among late adolescents in South India: What they know and what attitudes drive them. Indian J Psychol Med. 2016;38(3):234-41. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Gowers S, Thomas S, Deeley S. Can primary schools contribute effectively to tier I child mental health services? Clin Child Psychol Psychiat. 2004;9(3):419-25. [crossref]
6.
Koller JR, Bertel JM. Responding to today’s mental health needs of children, families and schools: Revisiting the preservice training and preparation of school-based personnel. Educ Treat Child. 2006;29(SI2):197-217.
7.
Sherman DK, McGue MK, Iacono WG. Twin concordance for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A comparison of teachers’ and mothers’ reports. Am J Psychiat. 1997;154(4):532-35. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Rosenberger PB. Attention deficit. Pediatr Neurol. 1991;7(6):397-405. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Alshammari SA, Alenezi S, Alanzan A, AlHawamdeh A, Alsulaiman O, Alqarni N, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practice among high school teachers toward students with mental disorders in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Sci. 2022;10(8):1582. [crossref]
10.
Russel P, Mammen P, Nair MKC, Russel S, Shankar SR. Priority mental health disorders of children and adolescents in primary- care pediatric setting in India 1: Developing a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Policy, Program, and Service Model. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;79(S1):19-26. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Nur N, Kavakci O. Elementary school teachers’ knowledge and attitudes related to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Health MED. 2010;2(4):350-55.
12.
Wahl O, Susin J, Lax A, Kaplan L, Zatina D. Knowledge and attitudes about mental illness: A survey of middle school students. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(7):649-54. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(10)980-89. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Arnold I, Hattie J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta- analyses relating to achievement. Int Rev Educ. 2011;57(1-2):219-21. [crossref]
15.
Rutter M. Pathways from childhood to adult life: The role of schooling. Pastoral Care in Education. 1991;9(3):03-10. [crossref]
16.
Prabhu V, Ashok L, Kamath VG, Kamath A, Chandrasekaran V. Exploring teachers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding mental health disorders in coastal Karnataka, India-A preliminary study. Asian J Epidemiol. 2019;12(1):32-37. [crossref]
17.
Ghanizadeh A, Bahredar MJ, Moeini SR. Knowledge and attitudes towards attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among elementary school teachers. Patient Edu Couns. 2016;63(1-2):84-88. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Youssef MK, Hutchinson G, Youssef FF. Knowledge of and attitudes toward ADHD among teachers: Insights from a Caribbean nation. SAGE Open [Internet]. 2015;5(1):215824401456676. [crossref]
19.
Lodhi SK, Thaver D, Akhtar IN, Javaid H, Mansoor M, Bano S, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of school teachers regarding dyslexia, attention- deficit/ hyperactivity and autistic spectrum disorders in Karachi, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016;28(1):99-104.
20.
Khademi M, Rajeziesfahani S, Noorbakhsh S, Panaghi L, Ashtiani RD, Razjouyan K, et al. Knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers in Tehran/Iran towards ADHD and SLD. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;12(8):141-51. [crossref]
21.
Kamel A, Haridi HK, Alblowi TM, Albasher AS, Alnazhah NA. Beliefs about students’ mental health issues among teachers at elementary and high schools, Hail Governorate, Saudi Arabia. Middle East Current Psychiatry. 2020;27(1):01-10. [crossref]
22.
Latifeh Y, Jaredh MDHW, Nasri L, Shriedy D, Al-Mahdi A, Murtada MHDW. Knowledge, stigma, and beliefs toward mental illness among school teachers in Damascus. Int J Soc Psychiatr. 2022;68(5):1054-62. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Akpan MU, Ojinnaka NC, Ekanem EE. Academic performance of school children with behavioural disorders in Uyo. Nigeria Afr Health Sci. 2010;10(2):154-58.
24.
Brook U, Watemberg N, Geva D. Attitude and knowledge of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disability among high school teachers. Patient Edu Couns. 2000;40(3):247-52. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Low NCP, Dugas E, O’Loughlin E, Rodriguez D, Contreras G, Chaiton M, et al. Common stressful life events and difficulties are associated with mental health symptoms and substance use in young adolescents. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):116. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Adrian C, Hammen C. Stress exposure and stress generation in children of depressed mothers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(2):354-59. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Hammen C. Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:293-319. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65338.19078

Date of Submission: May 10, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 19, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 01, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: This study was approved and funded by ICMR under the Short Term Studentship (STS) program, 2019 (Reference No.: 2019-02548).
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 09, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 24, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com